Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Occupy Oakland: More than 100 arrested; police defend tactics

Oakland police arrested more than 100 people during a night of clashes with Occupy Oakland protesters on the streets of downtown Oakland.

The scene had finally cleared after midnight Wednesday, but police were on alert in case crowds returned.

Oakland Interim Police Chief Howard Jordan said arrests were continuing and the total number might rise. Eight-five of those arrests were made early Tuesday, when officers raided the Occupy Oakland encampment on the plaza along with an annex in a park near Lake Merritt.

Jordan justified his department's use of tear gas.

"We were in a position where we had to deploy gas in order to stop the crowd and people from pelting us with bottles and rocks," he said.

PHOTOS: Occupy Oakland protest

Protesters had also thrown paint "and other agents" at officers, he said. The crowd reached about 1,000 at its peak, Jordan said, noting that police used bean bag rounds to disperse demonstrators. He said no rubber bullets were used -- a claim disputed by protesters.

Two officers were injured, Jordan said. He did not know how many demonstrators may have been hurt.

In an interview with KTVU-TV Channel 2, Officer David Carman said he had been hammered by paintballs and more.

"The crowd started throwing bottles, paints, beer, eggs at myself and the other officers," he said.

But some activists criticized the police tactics.

Kat Brooks, an Occupy Oakland activist and spokeswoman, said she took her young daughter home about 9:30 p.m. Tuesday because she did not want to expose her to the tear gas flooding downtown Oakland.

Protesters had marched from Frank Ogawa Plaza at City Hall to Snow Park, a swatch of green near Lake Merritt where an annex encampment had also been torn down by police this morning. They then returned to City Hall.

"We weren’t there but a minute before they started giving the dispersal order," Brooks said. "The first time they said five minutes, this time they said 'now.' They shot off the flash grenades and people scattered."

Brooks said her neighbors just returned home teargassed.

"This is the most disciplined I’ve ever seen Oakland be. There was no damage to property," she said. At one point, Brooks said, several officers were hit with paintballs, but she said they had come out swinging batons.

"From the way they came into the camp this morning to the way they acted tonight, they have gone beyond what was necessary," she said.

Report: Andy Rooney Hospitalized in Serious Condition

NEW YORK – Andy Rooney, who delivered his last essay on the CBS TV newsmagazine "60 Minutes" three weeks ago, was in the hospital Tuesday after developing serious complications following surgery.

CBS said the 92-year-old writer's condition was stable and, at the request of his family, offered no other information about his medical problems or where he was hospitalized.

The three-time Emmy-winner was a regular presence on television's most popular newsmagazine. Since 1978, "A Few Minutes with Andy Rooney" wrapped up the Sunday night program, often with a look at the absurdities of life and language.

Rooney could talk about what was in the news or what was in his closet. One of his Emmy Awards was for an essay about whether there was a real Mrs. Smith behind Mrs. Smith's Pies.

On Oct. 2, he delivered his 1,097th and final essay, saying it was a moment he dreaded.

"I wish I could do this forever. I can't, though," he said.

True to his often cantankerous nature, Rooney noted that he hated being recognized on the street. So if you see him in a restaurant, he said as he signed off, "please, just let me eat my dinner."

He's had a long career as a writer, and that's how he saw himself. He worked for the military newspaper Stars and Stripes and wrote four books about World War II. He wrote for entertainment personalities Arthur Godfrey and Garry Moore and had a longtime partnership with newsman Harry Reasoner.

With "60 Minutes" looking for something new at the end of its show, Rooney's first essay appeared on July 2, 1978: a complaint about people who kept track of how many people died in auto accidents over holiday weekends.

Amazon.com 3Q Profit Plunges 73%, Raises Possibility Of 4Q Loss

DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

Amazon.com Inc.'s (AMZN) third-quarter earnings plunged 73% because of its expensive spending program, as the No. 1 Internet retailer by sales said it could report an operating loss in the key fourth quarter.

Shares slid 14%, at $195.50 after hours. The stock hit its highest level ever last week and had since fallen 7.9% through the close.

Amazon, which has been investing aggressively in distribution and digital offerings at the expense of the bottom line in recent quarters, said the fourth quarter's bottom line could range from an operating loss of $200 million to a operating profit of $250 million. The fourth quarter includes the key holiday-shopping season.

The company also projected $16.45 billion and $18.65 billion in revenue in the current quarter. Analysts on average expected $18.15 billion, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

In the latest period, operating expenses jumped 48%, outstripping the pace of revenue growth. The company has posted double-digit percentage increases in expenses for over a year.

Amazon posted a profit of $63 million, or 14 cents a share, from $231 million, or 51 cents a share, a year earlier. Analysts predicted 24 cents a share.

Net sales increased 44%, to $10.88 billion. Excluding currency effects, the growth would have been 39%. In July, the company predicted $10.3 billion to $11 billion, largely better than analysts expected at the time.

Gross margin was flat, at 23.5%, but the margins of fulfillment and overhead costs to sales both weakened.

Operating income dropped 71%. In July, Amazon predicted operating income could fall as much as 93%.

John Lackey injury blessing in disguise

If the Red Sox [team stats] fall apart in 2012, fans won’t have one of their favorite targets to blame.

New general manager Ben Cherington dropped a bombshell during his introductory press conference yesterday, disclosing that right-hander John Lackey will undergo Tommy John surgery on his pitching elbow and probably miss the season.

No one ever wants to see a player hurt or cut open, but this could be a win-win for all involved.


The Sox remove one of the beer drinkers from their ranks at a time when they’re trying to alter their clubhouse culture. And even though Lackey was by all accounts an excellent teammate — we’re now learning he pitched hurt all season — something needed to change among the starting five, and this is it.

From Lackey’s perspective, he gets a year away from the slings and arrows, a year to get his life in order — he’s reportedly in the midst of a divorce — and maybe even a year to assess the way he’s conducted himself since signing a five-year, $82.5 million contract.

If he comes back in 2013 as a calmer, less combative person, that’s all to the good. And if he regains the stuff that made him an All-Star and a proven playoff performer, even better.

“Aside from just getting healthy, there could be some benefit,” Cherington acknowledged after his press conference. “You’d have to ask John to get a better answer. He’s been going through a lot. I think he’s closer to resolving some of that stuff than he was a year ago. But maybe it is an opportunity for a fresh start physically and mentally.”

The news really was a gift for Cherington on his first official day on the job. Tackling the wayward rotation projected to be unpleasant, since breaking up the group would have required one of three equally unpalatable options: a) paying someone virtually all of the $45 million remaining on Lackey’s contract to take him; b) trading a young talent like Jon Lester [stats] or Clay Buchholz; or c) getting less than market value for former ace Josh Beckett [stats].

Now the problem is solved. Cherington can’t jettison any of the three remaining starters, because the Sox are too thin at the position to withstand the loss.

Likewise, he won’t be asked about it again either, because there’s been change, now that Lackey’s out of the mix. Everybody wins.

Cherington’s comments yesterday, both before and after his press conference, also shed some much-needed light on what Lackey endured while going 12-12 with a 6.41 ERA last year.

“Let me start by saying that John Lackey pitched through circumstances this year that I don’t think anyone in this room can fully understand,” Cherington said. “And he got beat up a little for it along the way.”

Lackey underwent an MRI in May after experiencing elbow soreness, and according to Cherington it roughly resembled the one he had before signing. Everyone agreed to the conservative approach of rest and rehab, and he returned in June.

But the elbow worsened down the stretch. His last start was one of his gutsiest. Despite altering his delivery, Lackey limited the Yankees to three earned runs in six innings of a 7-4 victory. That start ended up being overshadowed by both the team’s collapse and Lackey’s postgame anti-media rant.

“He made that last start and he pitched well, but he was battling it,” Cherington said. “We felt the best thing to do was to get it checked again.”

Lackey visited Dr. Lewis Yocum in Los Angeles, and Yocum recommended surgery, which will be performed in the coming weeks.

It's time for T.O. to face reality

Now that the glow of his reality-TV-show life has inevitably faded, Terrell Owens is left with this ugly truth: He’s squandered so much good will, traded in enough talent for shallow adulation and so-often exchanged your good name for fleeting press that he’s now more of an empty fraud than a famed star.


T.O. SHOW
He's been the ultimate showman and the ultimate headache. Relive the top 10 moments of Terrell Owens' career.
I say this with no joy. I say this knowing that we all help put him there. I say this knowing that he has psychological problems that make this more tragedy than farce, more social commentary than Terrell Owens takedown.

How can you not feel sorry for the guy? Here, at the end of his career, two networks and a greedy public happily consumed his demise Tuesday because everyone knows what he alone does not: He is a live-action train wreck being exploited for our amusement. He’s placed himself in the trash bin of not just sports culture but American culture. He’s been dumped in the same sorry place as Lindsay Lohan, John Edwards, Paris Hilton and the other attention-craving bottom feeders he can count as his contemporaries.

It’s sad, it’s unfortunate, but it’s true. Terrell Owens is officially a joke. Exploited by us, exploited by himself, and now at the sorry end showcasing his pathetic place in football and American culture for everyone to see.

The fact that no NFL team sent a representative to check out his hour-long workout today simply proves the point that he’s veered from big-time talent to attention-grabbing distraction to this inevitable end: A has-been. In the days ahead, maybe someone will take a chance on his surgically repaired knee and his 37-year-old body and his penchant for problems and his can’t-help-myself ego. Maybe they won’t.

Either way, the tryout his agent, Drew Rosenhaus, set up Tuesday was not the hoped-for proof that he’s ready for a comeback. The hour-long circus, broadcast live on the NFL Network and hyped on ESPN, was just a glimpse into his sad future and squandered past.

Let’s not forget this is a man who has reportedly attempted to commit suicide more than once. He’s a joke — the world laughs at him now rather than with him. He alone seems to think the good times are still rolling. Fact is, people put up with a lot if the talent is there. Too much. And this is what life looks like when that talent fades, when all that’s left is the ugliness behind the gift, the spoiled special person who’s special no more.


15 MINUTES OF FAME
Sports is the ultimate "unscripted TV." No wonder so many athletes have appeared on reality shows.
It holds true eventually for sexy women and good-looking men who decide to develop nothing beyond their bodies and beauty. True for rich guys who build relationships around money once the money vanishes. True for the bosses who bully underlings into false friendships and faux respect the moment those bosses switch jobs.

True, at long last, for one Terrell Owens.

This, too, is true: Too often those people’s demons and struggles go unchecked because the talent is too important to disturb. Suicide attempts? Let’s focus on the game Sunday. Depression issues? Winning will make it all OK. An incessant and unhealthy need for attention and false love? Sure, you can have it all – just keep catching the ball.

Part of what’s happened here is that TO got sucked into the reality-TV machine. Or more accurately, perhaps, he walked into it with arms open wide, his sights set on false fame, increased attention and that momentary fix of having more eyes and more eyes and more eyes until the world can’t stand what it’s looking at.

But what’s really sad, and what says volumes about our culture, is that TO never needed to go all “Jersey Shore” with his life. He had the gifts and the skill and a chosen profession that put his name in lights, anyway. But this is 2011, this is America, and so the drug of a reality-TV life became too much.

He wanted what too many want: Glitz, attention, that instant gratification, that sudden rush of celebrity over substance — that pull so powerful even those with fame crave a higher level of it, more of it, a more-concentrated version of their name in lights.

Everywhere you look, people who can be more choose instead to be in the limelight. It’s modern-day whoring — selling the best part of oneself for a quick payday with no thought of the consequences.

In this new paradigm, the viewing public gets its, er, momentary kicks. And the new-age whores get kicked to the curb when what they have to offer leaves them; a sad joke before they realize no one was laughing with them. Just at them.


COACH SPEAK
Brian Billick dives into the minds of NFL coaches across the league | Watch the show
The list of the famous and not-so famous blinded by klieg lights is long and varied. There are the nobodies-to-somebodies like Chris Moneymaker (who kicked off the poker craze). There are athletes like Dennis Rodman, men who should have enough but crave more and more and more until they’re a caricature of themselves.

There’s the slew of shows like “Jersey Shore,” where everyday people unleash their lives on the viewing public, making us all a little worse off.

And this isn’t limited to sports or anonymous folks thrust onto TV.

Edwards decided running for president wasn’t enough. He needed more, more, more . . . and he got it — the attention, the inflated ego, the separation from reality, and, finally, a woman who was not his wife pregnant, allegations of misusing campaign contributions to cover it up, and soon enough a trial.

Take Lohan. The talented actress — and she was — announced today she’ll be posing for Playboy. Of course she will. Blessed with remarkable skill in a field tailor-made to make her famous, she instead let her fame — and the need for more, more, more — sour her.

So it’s appropriate that today, as Edwards' trial approaches and Lohan goes all naked and Snooki remains a household name, the place Owens made for himself in the world crystallized once and for all. It’s not that no one cares about him. That’s the wrong way to look at it. They do. The cameras came, the chatter spread, I and other writers chose to write about the man. Owens got what he wanted. He got 15 minutes more. It’s what’s been lost that’s the issue: his respect, his place in the game, his chance to return from his reality-TV life and be something more substantial.

Maybe the Bears will take a flyer on the once-great wide receiver. Maybe another middling team in need of another weapon will ignore the years of trouble and drama in San Francisco, Dallas, Philly and elsewhere. If they do, it’ll be a fleeting chance. If they don’t, it’ll be no surprise.

Either way, this is Owens’ world now: A tryout no one comes to see, a joke he doesn’t get because he is the joke, a slew of problems that we should be mourning but too often mock. A joke that could end up having a decidedly somber punch line.

“I only need one team (to be interested), I only need one chance,” Owens told reporters at the event, held at a suburban Los Angeles high school. “With what I did today, it should open some eyes.”

He’s opened too many eyes, already. What’s there to be seen is sad and ugly.

Facts are facts, and here are TO’s: His contemporaries aren’t and will not be Randy Moss, Marvin Harrison, Larry Fitzgerald, Andre Johnson or the others.

They are Snooki, Lohan, Hilton and all the others who traded whomever they were for whatever person would get the world to watch.

All about Jenna Lyons

If you own a sweater, or pencil skirt or pair of oxfords from J.Crew, you have already been acquainted with Jenna Lyons, even if you don't know her by name.
The creative director and president of J.Crew, who is currently going through a messy divorce, is credited with developing the retail behemoth's preppy-yet-offbeat aesthetic. In recent years, Lyons has become a style personality, the antidote to the Alexander McQueens and Lady Gagas of the world, known for mixing basics with the subtly quirky.
J.CREW EXEC IN MESSY SPLIT
Women deeply identify with the laid-back, 6-foot-5 creative director and have increasingly been interested in the minutiae of her life. In 2008, J.Crew sought to take advantage of Lyons' appealing personality by creating "Jenna's Picks," a section in their catalogues dedicated to her favorite items.

GETTY IMAGES FOR MERCEDES-BENZ F
Jenna Lyons with Solange Knowles at the J.Crew Spring 2012 fashion show during Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week.
Lyons has appeared in magazines like Glamour, InStyle and Lucky and has even been on "Oprah" in a segment filmed in her closet. Forbes magazine said that she reached "icon status comparable to the likes of superstar designers like Donna Karan and Miuccia Prada."
Lyons' family life has long been part of her story. She married artist Vincent Mazeau in 2002 in a ceremony that was covered in New York magazine.
"Vincent and I envisioned a black-tie barbecue for our wedding," Lyons said alongside photos of her in an easy, breezy wedding dress and Mazeau in a kilt.
The couple's townhouse in Park Slope has been frequently photographed, and become an object of lust for many a New Yorker. "My trick has been to approach each area like putting together an outfit," Lyons told Living Etc. "You might start with an old pair of jeans, a cashmere cardigan, or a floral belt, and work around that central fashion statement."
Earlier this year, Mazeau shot photos of Lyons and their son Beckett, 5, around the house for a J.Crew feature called "Saturday with Jenna." One of the images showed Lyons' painting her son's toes hot pink. A scandal erupted, with newscasters dissecting the image and claiming Lyons was sending confusing gender messages to her son. Jon Stewart jokingly dubbed the incident "Toemaggedon."
"I’m not surprised that [Beckett] was interested in what I was doing," Lyons told New York magazine. "My God, my toes went from white to hot pink — it was very exciting."
Originally from Palos Verdes, Calif., Lyons came to New York in 1987 to study at Parsons. In 1990, she started at J.Crew -- then a small upstart. By 2007, she had worked her way up to creative director. In 2009 she earned $750,000 and was given bonuses and benefits bringing her total pay to $4.2 million, according to reports. Last year, she was named company president.
Earlier today, Page Six reported that Lyons and Mazeau split this summer, and that divorce proceedings are getting contentious. Mazeau is seeking custody of Beckett, as well as the couple's townhouse and a large settlement, arguing that he put the breaks on his career to stay home with their son. Meanwhile, Lyons friends say she supported his career and gave him a financially comfortable life. Lyons is reportedly in love again, this time with a woman.
J.Crew would not respond to whispers of the split.


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/all_about_jenna_lyons_us3sBAN6gxlENValJysmoI#ixzz1btHF4GHI

Next Generation Weather Satellite To Launch Friday

DENVER -- Ball Aerospace in Boulder will launch its $1.5 billion project on Friday from Vandenburg Air Force Base in California. The next-generation weather satellite will then begin its five-year journey observing Earth from space.
The satellite has a lengthy name: National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System Preparatory Project. NPP contains five on-board instruments that will collect information for more than 30 key long-term data sets. These records, which range from the ozone layer and land cover to atmospheric temperatures and ice cover, are critical for understanding the earth's climate and its changes over time.
Ball Aerospace designed and built the spacecraft bus, and since 2005 its team of scientists has run the on-board instruments through extensive testing to prepare them for the extreme elements in outer space. NPP will fly at an altitude of 512 miles and will circle the globe 14 times a day.

Scientists are enthusiastic about the new technology, which will be available following the significant weather events of 2011. according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the United States saw 10 billion-dollar disasters just this year.
"The timing of this NPP launch could hardly be more appropriate," said Dr. Louis W. Uccellini, NOAA director of the National Center for Environmental Prediction. “With NPP we expect to improve and extend our forecast skills out to five to seven days in advance for hurricanes and other extreme weather events. We expect the advanced instruments on NPP to become a foundation for the global observing system that will be absolutely essential."
NPP will be launched on a Delta II rocket built in Centennial.
For more information on the satellite mission, visit the official NPP website.

Ed Lee vetoes SF health care bill - antibusiness

Mayor Ed Lee on Tuesday issued his first veto since taking office in January, describing legislation intended to close a loophole in San Francisco's law requiring employers to provide some funding for their workers' health care expenses as bad for business.

"This legislation aims to solve an important problem, but imposes an overly broad approach to solving a discrete set of issues," Lee said in his veto letter.

The Board of Supervisors approved the proposal on a 6-5 vote last week, setting up a showdown with Lee just weeks before the Nov. 8 mayoral election, in which polls show him as the front-runner in a field of 16 candidates.

Four of his rivals, Supervisor John Avalos, City Attorney Dennis Herrera, city Assessor-Recorder Phil Ting and state Sen. Leland Yee, have signaled they will make Lee's veto a campaign issue, having rallied on the steps of City Hall this month urging him to support the plan.

It's unlikely sponsors of the legislation will get eight votes to override the veto. But Supervisor David Campos, chief sponsor of the legislation, said Lee "is taking San Francisco in the wrong direction" by limiting the funding uninsured workers can access to pay for their health care needs.

Campos said he is considering taking his proposal to the voters. It takes four supervisors to place a measure on the ballot.

The Campos plan targets the provision in the city's groundbreaking health care law that allows employers to set up individual health care reimbursement accounts for uninsured workers. Participating employers contribute up to $4,252 annually into each worker's account, but any unused money at the end of the year can go back to the employer.

Last year, 860 businesses out of the approximately 4,000 covered by the law contributed a combined $62.5 million into the reimbursement accounts, but just $12.4 million was used by workers. Employers pocketed the rest.

Under the Campos amendment, the unspent money would accrue in the accounts. Only after a worker has been off the payroll for 18 months could an employer get the money back.

Business owners and their trade association said it would force them to lay off workers, shelve expansion plans, move out of the city or close.

Lee said that while he agrees the proposal would be bad for business, he believes changes are needed.

One of his goals, he has said, is to get businesses to be less restrictive on how the money can be used. Some employers, for example, won't reimburse workers for health insurance premiums or for enrollment in a city plan that makes use of public clinics and hospitals.

The Campos amendment, he said, would not increase access to health care or protect jobs. "Moreover, this cash, pulled out of our local economy, will not be available to pay wages or grow businesses," Lee told supervisors.

The mayor formed a working group to see whether a compromise could be brokered and Lee said in his veto letter that he is "confident there is a legislative path forward."

Meanwhile, Board of Supervisors President David Chiu has offered a different amendment to address the loophole. Under his version, at least a year's worth of unused employer contributions must always be available to avoid a use-it-or-lose-it scenario.

The board was to vote on Chiu's plan Monday, but, at his urging, delayed consideration for one week.

Chiu, Campos and Lee all agree that employers should do a better job of telling workers how to access the reimbursement funds, and also want to prevent restaurants from placing a surcharge on their patrons' bills for employees' health care unless the money is actually used for that purpose.

"Once we're past this week, I'm looking forward to working with my colleagues to find a solution," said Chiu, who also is running for mayor.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/25/BAKG1LMB78.DTL#ixzz1btGfVOnH

Grand Theft Auto 5 Announced, Minecraft XBLA, Arkham City Ships 4.6 mill